What is the semantic gap in zero-shot learning?

In the context of zero-shot learning, a semantic gap refers to the disparity between the representation of data in a machine learning model and how humans understand and describe that data. In other words, the semantic gap is the disconnection between the low-level features (such as pixel values or basic visual characteristics) and the abstract concepts (such as object categories, attributes, or actions) that these features represent.

Example

Consider a zero-shot learning model that classifies different types of fruits, such as “citrus,” “berries,” and “tropical.” The model has been trained solely on textual descriptions and examples of each fruit category without ever seeing actual images of fruits. Now, we want the model to classify an “exotic” fruit showcased in a national cooking show.

Humans can consider various factors like color, size, and texture to categorize the fruit as “exotic,” a term linked with rare and unusual fruits. However, the model could struggle to distinguish the subtle traits defining the “exotic” fruit category because of its limited exposure to the complicated visual sensory attributes and the broader culinary context influencing this classification.

In this scenario, the semantic gap appears because humans can rely on their extensive understanding of fruits and culinary traditions to accurately classify the fruit. Conversely, due to the model’s limitations in understanding the complex characteristics of fruits, the model is unable to categorize them with certainty.

Underlying reasons

There are several causes that contribute to the semantic gap in zero-shot learning listed below:

• Feature extraction challenges: It is a difficult task to extract significant visual characteristics from raw data such as photographs. Different characteristics might highlight different parts of the data, making it challenging to create an ideal representation that aligns well with semantic descriptions.

• The subjectivity of language: Semantic descriptions are frequently subjective and depend on context. Different people may describe the same thing differently. This subjectivity can result in differences in how objects are described linguistically, resulting in a mismatch with visual features.

• Ambiguity: Some words or phrases hold numerous meanings. For example, a “red car” might refer to several pigments of red, and discriminating between these pigments could be difficult for visual recognition systems.

• Polysemy: Some words have several meanings. For example, “bat” might refer to a flying animal or a piece of baseball equipment. It might be challenging to determine the proper interpretation based just on visual signals.

• Fine-grained concepts: Sometimes, it's really important to notice tiny differences, especially in specific areas. Like when we want to tell apart different kinds of birds, we need to see small details that regular words might not fully explain.

• Cultural and contextual variation: Language and descriptions might differ depending on culture and environment. Visual representations may be viewed differently based on the observer’s cultural background or situation.

• Lack of annotated data: In zero-shot learning, we want to recognize things, but sometimes, we don’t have any examples with labels to learn from. This makes it even harder to connect what things look like with what they mean.

• Evolution of language: Language changes over time, and the descriptions we employ to characterize objects may change more quickly than visual representations. This might result in inconsistencies between older semantic descriptions and modern visual characteristics.

Minimization techniques

Minimizing the semantic gap in zero-shot learning involves addressing the disparity between the representations of data in the training and testing phases. Here are some strategies to mitigate the semantic gap in zero-shot learning:

• Attribute-based representations: To bridge the gap between visual characteristics and semantic descriptions, use attribute-based representations. Attributes are fundamental traits or features that may be used to describe objects. The model may learn to correlate visual characteristics with descriptive properties by including attribute-based representations, making it easier to generalize to previously unseen classes.

• Word embeddings: Convert class names or descriptions into continuous vector representations using word embeddings. This aids in matching visual characteristics with semantic descriptions by capturing the semantic links between distinct classes.

• Generative models: To produce realistic visual features from semantic descriptions, use generative models. These features may subsequently be utilized to train zero-shot learning models, minimizing the need for real-world visual input.

• Transfer learning and pretraining: Pretrain the model on a similar problem, such as a large-scale classification job, then fine-tune it on the zero-shot learning task. This can assist the model in learning valuable feature representations that can be adapted to the particular zero-shot learning task.

• Multi-modal learning: During training, combine information from several modalities (e.g., visuals and text). This can help the model develop a more comprehensive representation by using the complimentary information offered by multiple modalities.

• Data augmentation and synthesis: During training, use data augmentation techniques to artificially enhance the diversity of visual input. This might make the model more resistant to changes in visual appearance. Furthermore, data synthesis techniques may be used to produce training examples for previously unknown classes, addressing the issue of data scarcity.

• Hierarchical approaches: Organize classes in a hierarchical structure where the relationships between classes are explicitly defined. This can help the model generalize better by learning from related classes when making predictions for unseen classes.

• Knowledge graphs: Use external knowledge graphs or databases with semantic links between classes. These graphs can give useful information about class properties, hierarchies, and connections to the model, allowing it to better grasp the semantic context.

• Attention mechanisms: Include attention methods in the model design to help the model focus on relevant areas of the input data. Attention can help the model better correlate visual characteristics with semantic descriptions.

• Regularization techniques: Reduce the domain shift between the seen and unseen classes by using regularization strategies such as domain adaption or domain alignment. This has the potential to boost the model’s ability to generalize to new classes.

Note: The effectiveness of all the above metioned strategies may vary depending on the specific zero-shot learning problem and dataset.

Test your understanding

Let’s evaluate your understating of the concept we have learned so far: