Manual vs. automated testing

Key takeaways:

  • Ensures software output aligns with expectations, focusing on quality assurance and defect resolution.

  • Manual testing involves human testers and is effective for user experience, while automated testing uses tools for efficiency and consistency.

  • Automated testing offers faster execution, broader test coverage, and reduces human error over time.

  • The decision between manual and automated testing depends on specific project goals—user experience vs. code validation.

  • Automated testing has a higher initial investment but lower long-term costs, while manual testing is less expensive upfront but more costly over time.

Software testing is a core part of software product development and is used to ensure that the developed software’s actual output is similar to the expected output. The primary goals of testing include quality assurance, correct functioning, reliability, reusability, and finding and resolving any bugs or defects that could possibly arise during the development of the software.

Types of software testing

Software tests are divided into various categories based on the type of functionality they test, the methodology applied for testing, and whether they are conducted by humans or tools, etc. In this Answer, we'll explore the differences between manual and automated testing.

1. Manual testing

Manual testing is the process in which human testers conduct rigorous testing of the software product without the use of any automation tools. For instance, testers can be asked to use a form to test its functionality, play around with an application to push its limits, and much more.

Thought of as traditional testing that is time consuming and requires human resource, manual testing beats automated testing when it comes to evaluating user interface and user experience.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Focuses on user experience

Time-consuming, especially for repetitive tasks

Anyone can test, facilitating hiring

Prone to human error

Lower costs without the need for automation tools

High expertise needed: Complex cases require skilled testers

2. Automated testing

Automated testing is the process in which an automation tool, commonly known as a testing framework, is used to test software. Several tools are available that the testers can use to automate tests, such as Selenium, Cucumber, WinRunner, etc.

Alternatively, testers can also write scripts in the language used to build the application to test it.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Reduces time for regression tests: Executes tests repeatedly

Difficult to inspect visual elements

Executes tests without human fatigue

Implementation can be expensive due to tool requirements

Easily scales to handle large test cases

Requires trained employees: Needs knowledge of programming and testing

Comparison

The following table provides a comparison between the two types of testing:

Manual vs. automated testing

Aspect

Manual testing

Automated testing

Perform by

Human testers

Automation tools and scripts

Execution time

Slower

Faster

Human resource

More

Less

Reliability

Less

More

Powerful

Less

More

Human error

Yes

No

Test coverage

Less

More

Money

Lower initial investment but higher in the long run.

Higher initial investment but lower in the long run.

Execution consistency

Results may vary based on tester's experience and skill.

Consistent results regardless of tester's experience.

What should we choose?

From a quick glance at the comparison table, it would seem that automated testing is better than manual testing. However, the type of testing to choose really depends on the right environment. If the goal is to evaluate visuals, usability, and user experience, manual testing is the way to go.

On the other hand, to test code implementation, catch bugs, and identify security issues, automated testing would be a more comprehensive choice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, software testing is an essential component of software development that plays a crucial role in ensuring product quality.

Understanding the differences between manual and automated testing helps organizations make informed decisions about their testing strategies, allowing them to balance quality, efficiency, and resource allocation effectively.

Quiz!

1

Which tool is not typically used for automated testing?

A)

Cucumber

B)

WinRunner

C)

Selenium

D)

Microsoft Word

Question 1 of 30 attempted

Frequently asked questions

Haven’t found what you were looking for? Contact Us


Is manual testing a good career?

Yes, manual testing can be a good career choice, especially for those who enjoy problem-solving and understanding user experiences. It offers entry-level opportunities, develops critical thinking, and allows for teamwork. However, it can involve repetitive tasks and may have limited growth potential, especially as the industry shifts toward automation.

Balancing manual testing skills with automation knowledge can enhance career prospects.


Which is better, manual or automation testing?

The choice between manual and automated testing depends on the specific project requirements.

Manual testing is ideal for exploratory testing, usability evaluations, and scenarios requiring human judgment. It allows for immediate feedback on user experience. In contrast, automation testing is more efficient for repetitive tasks, regression testing, and large-scale projects, providing faster execution and consistent results.


Does manual testing require coding?

No, but basic progamming knowledge can be helpful.


Free Resources

Copyright ©2025 Educative, Inc. All rights reserved