Activation functions are essential for adding non-linearity to neural network architectures, which allows the network to recognize complex patterns and correlations in input data. The Parametric Rectified Linear Unit (PReLU) and the Leaky Rectified Linear Unit (Leaky ReLU) are two well-known activation functions that have attracted interest.
In this Answer, we’ll explain these activation functions in detail, along with their mathematical formulations and the main distinctions between them.
Leaky ReLU is an expansion of the conventional
The mathematical expression for Leaky ReLU is defined as follows:
In this case,
The concept of Leaky ReLU is extended by the Parametric Rectified Linear Unit (PRELU), which learns the negative slope of the activation function. This implies that the slope for negative inputs is considered a parameter to be optimized throughout the training process rather than utilizing a constant value like
The mathematical expression for PReLU is given by:
In PReLU,
The table below highlights the key difference between PReLU and Leaky ReLU:
PReLU | Leaky ReLU | |
Learnability | The negative slope in PRELU is a learnable parameter, so the model may adjust and improve it as it is being trained. This flexibility can be very important for jobs with different optimum slopes of various layers or neurons. | The negative slope (α) in Leaky ReLU is a fixed hyperparameter that needs to be manually adjusted. |
Flexibility | The network may learn various negative slopes for different neurons and layers, so PReLU offers a higher degree of flexibility. Because of its flexibility, PReLU can identify and recognize more complex patterns in the data. | The structure of Leaky ReLU is less flexible due to its fixed α. Although it adds some flexibility, it might not be as good at capturing minute differences in the data. |
Expressiveness | PReLU’s learnable parameter enables a more expressive description of complicated functions. | Leaky ReLU have fixed slope so comparatively less expressive. |
Computational complexity | PReLU has a little greater computational cost as it adds more parameters that must be optimised during training, so more complex. | It is comparatively less complex. |
Application in deep networks | The learnable parameter in PReLU can assist in mitigating the vanishing gradient problem in deeper networks by enabling the network to adjust the slope in response to the gradient flow. | Because of its fixed slope, leaky ReLU might not offer as much control over the gradient flow in deep architectures |
In conclusion, to solve the problem of dead neurons and improve learning in neural networks, PReLU and Leaky ReLU are both beneficial substitutes for the conventional ReLU activation function. The work’s particulars, the data’s properties, and the available computational resources influence the best option. Leaky ReLU is a straightforward solution with a predetermined negative slope, but PReLU offers a more advanced method by letting the network figure out the ideal slope as it is being trained. Finding an activation function that compromises computing efficiency and expressive capability for a given neural network design and dataset requires practical testing and experimentation.
Free Resources