In Next JS, there are two primary methods to render your application – Server-side rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG). Both come with their own sets of pros and cons, affecting aspects such as performance, development workflow, SEO, and user experience. In this Answer, we will explore both these methods and compare the difference between them.
Server-side rendering is the process where the server generates the HTML content on each request. Each time a user or
Excellent for SEO: As the entire page is server-rendered, web crawlers can easily crawl the site for better SEO.
Real-time data: If your site's content updates frequently, SSR ensures the user always sees the most recent content.
TTFB (Time to First Byte): As the server has to create the HTML for each request, the user might experience more delay before seeing the page.
Server load: Each request to the server generates a new HTML page, which could put a heavier load on the server, especially for high-traffic websites. This might require more server resources and can lead to higher costs.
SSR is suitable for applications requiring real-time data, personalization, or SEO optimization.
It is ideal for pages with frequently changing content or user-specific data.
Static Site Generation involves generating the HTML pages at build time, meaning the server generates the HTML once and uses the same HTML for every request. This technique is beneficial when dealing with sites where content changes infrequently.
Fast loading times: As the HTML is pre-generated and can be served from a CDN, users often experience extremely fast load times.
Reduced server load: Since pages are pre-generated, there's less load on your server as it doesn't have to generate a page for each request.
Build time: If you have thousands of pages, it might increase your build time.
Data freshness: If your data changes frequently, you would have to rebuild your application to reflect those changes. However, Next JS does offer an Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) feature to overcome this issue.
SSG is suitable for content-heavy websites, blogs, and marketing pages with relatively static content.
It is ideal for sites that don't require real-time data updates for every user visit.
Next JS also supports Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR), allowing us to use static generation on a per-page basis, without needing to rebuild the entire site. With ISR, we can set a fallback page that will show while the request waits for the generated page.
To explore more about ISR, click here.
SSR | SSG | |
Rendering time | The HTML is generated on-the-fly at the time of each request by the server. | The HTML is generated at build time and reused for each request. |
Performance | Each request results in a round-trip to the server, which could lead to longer loading times compared to SSG, especially if the server is under heavy load or the user has a slow internet connection. | As the page is pre-rendered and can be served from a Content Delivery Network (CDN), it typically loads faster than SSR. |
Real-time data | Ideal for pages that need to display real-time or frequently updated data, as the content is always fresh from the server. | Not ideal for displaying real-time data, as the content is static and only updated at build time. |
Server load | Every request to the server generates a new HTML page, which could put a heavier load on the server. | Lower server load as the HTML is generated only once at build time and served statically for each subsequent request. |
Development complexity | Typically requires a server or serverless functions to generate the HTML for each request. It might add a level of complexity depending on the project's architecture. | Usually simpler because the HTML is pre-generated. The deployment can be as simple as hosting static files on a CDN. |
The choice between SSR and SSG depends largely on your application’s specific requirements:
Using SSR: If your page needs to be updated frequently, requires real-time data, or needs to be personalized for individual users. E-commerce sites or social media platforms could be examples where SSR might be preferable.
Using SSG: When your page can be pre-rendered ahead of a user’s request. This is often the case for blog posts, marketing pages, or documentation, where content changes infrequently and doesn’t require user-specific data on every request.
Next JS offers both SSR and SSG rendering strategies, each with its strengths and use cases. SSR provides real-time data and personalized content but may have slower response times. On the other hand, SSG offers faster loading and scalability.
Learn more about:
Free Resources