What is correlating branch prediction?

Branch prediction is an essential component of contemporary computer design that affects processor performance and efficiency. One of the most sophisticated methods used in branch prediction is correlated branch prediction. By capturing the complex trends and interconnections present in program execution, this method seeks to go beyond straightforward, localized forecasts. We shall explore the idea of correlated branch prediction in this Answer, including its benefits, drawbacks, and underlying mechanics.

Background

For processors to anticipate the results of conditional branches in a program, branch prediction is a crucial method. When a program comes across a decision point, such as an “if” statement, that presents two alternative courses of action, conditional branches occur. Performance can be increased by anticipating the right branch’s result, enabling the processor to retrieve and carry out instructions before waiting for the branch resolution.

Conventional branch predictors emphasize local history, such as two-level adaptive predictors. They base their forecasts on what has happened in the past when the same branch has occurred. But branches frequently show relationships and patterns beyond local history in real-world situations. This issue is attempted to be addressed by correlating branch prediction, which considers the connections between various branches.

Correlating branch prediction

Correlating branch prediction entails determining correlations or dependencies between several branches by examining their past behavior. The objective is to make better predictions for a different branch by utilizing knowledge about the result of a previous branch. This method recognizes that some branches could behave in associated ways because of how the program’s control flow is designed.

General process of correlating branch prediction

Correlating branch predictors enhances prediction accuracy by considering global information about the behavior of multiple branches instead of relying solely on the recent history of a single branch. The process is characterized by using (m,n) predictors, where ‘m’ signifies the number of earlier branches considered for correlation, and ‘n’ represents the number of bits in each predictor. Common choices for ‘n’ include 1-bit and 2-bit predictors. A 1-bit predictor can only take two states (usually strongly taken or strongly not taken), while a 2-bit predictor can have four states (strongly taken, weakly taken, weakly not taken, and strongly not taken).

Example:

• m = 2

• n = 2

1. Considered branches: The predictor focuses on the behavior of the last two branches, denoted as B1 and B2.

2. Possible combinations: For each combination of B1 and B2 behavior, there are four possibilities: 00, 01, 10, and 11.

3. Individual predictors: A 2-bit predictor is employed for each combination, offering four states:

   1. 00 (Strongly not taken): The predictor strongly believes the branch will not be taken.

   2. 01 (Weakly not taken): Leaning toward not taken but less confident.

   3. 10 (Weakly taken): Leaning toward taken but less confident.

   4. 11 (Strongly taken): The predictor strongly believes the branch will be taken.

4. Prediction process: Based on the observed behavior of B1 and B2, the predictor uses the corresponding 2-bit predictor to make predictions for the current branch. This nuanced approach allows for a more sophisticated prediction mechanism, considering the historical patterns of multiple branches.

In short, the correlating branch prediction process involves maintaining information about the behavior of earlier branches, using specific predictors for different combinations, and making predictions based on a combination’s historical context.

Two-level correlating predictors

The two-level correlating predictor is a popular way to apply correlating branch prediction. This predictor creates a matrix of predictions by keeping track of the results of recent branches for two distinct branches in a table. Concatenating one branch’s global history with another’s local history creates the index in this table. As a result, the predictor can capture correlations between the two branches.

Gshare predictor

One particular kind of two-level correlating predictor is the Gshare predictor. It makes forecasts by fusing aspects of local and global history. Every branch has access to the same global history, which captures the relationships between various branches. To create forecasts, the local history of a particular branch is mixed with this common global history.

Advantages of correlating branch prediction

It is essential to comprehend the complexities of branch prediction to maximize processor performance. Correlating branch prediction is a cutting-edge strategy superior to conventional approaches in this application. Let’s examine the benefits of correlating branch prediction and its performance while managing intricate control flows and changing workloads.

• Improved accuracy: Compared to conventional local predictors, correlated branch prediction can greatly improve prediction accuracy. The predictor’s ability to adjust to patterns and dependencies in the program’s control flow is enhanced by considering the relationships amongst branches.

• Handling complex control flow: Many programs have complex control flow patterns, where the result of one branch depends on the results of many branches that came before it. Such situations are a natural fit for correlated predictors, which increases their predictability of complicated control flows.

• Enhanced adaptability to dynamic workloads: Correlating branch predictors better adjust to changing workloads. Because the predictor can collect and use correlations between branches, it can quickly adapt to changing patterns in dynamic program behavior. This flexibility improves forecast accuracy and is especially useful when the workload fluctuates.

Challenges and considerations

Like any other cutting-edge technology, correlated branch prediction has difficulties and things to consider. It is critical to comprehend and resolve these issues to maximize the use of correlating predictors in implementation. Now, let’s explore the details and possible pitfalls, looking at how the design and performance of correlated branch predictors are affected by increased complexity and sensitivity to program modifications.

• Increased complexity: Maintaining and analyzing correlations between several branches makes correlated predictors more difficult than their local equivalents. This complexity may lead to higher hardware needs and possible performance overhead.

• Sensitivity to program changes: Modifications in the program’s behavior can impact correlating predictors’ efficiency. The predictor’s accuracy may decline if the correlations found during training become incorrect due to changes to the program or the input data.

Quiz

Take the quiz to test your understanding of the topic:

Conclusion

Correlating branch prediction is a smart approach to improving branch prediction accuracy in modern processors. Correlating predictors can improve performance in various applications by adapting to complicated control flow patterns and considering the linkages between branches. However, some issues must be carefully considered while designing these predictors due to their increased complexity and vulnerability to program modifications. Correlating branch prediction is still an essential field of study and development for processor performance optimization as computer architectures advance.