Yes, Unity supports asynchronous programming using the async and await keywords. This allows for non-blocking operations, improving performance and responsiveness, especially when dealing with long-running tasks or I/O operations.
Key takeaways:
Coroutines in Unity are frame-based methods for sequential execution over multiple frames.
Coroutines are ideal for delays, animations, and incremental game logic.
Coroutines lack error handling, value returns, and multithreading support.
Async functions use C#'s
async
andawait
for asynchronous operations without blocking the main thread.Async functions handle background tasks like file I/O and web requests efficiently.
Coroutines are part of Unity’s MonoBehaviour, while async functions are a general C# feature.
Async functions support error handling and return values using
Task<T>
.Coroutines stop if their associated MonoBehaviour is destroyed, while async functions require manual lifetime management.
Coroutines work on the main thread, while async functions can leverage multithreading.
Coroutines excel in frame-based tasks; async functions are better for I/O-heavy workflows.
In game development, triggering actions of a series of frames or having multiple actions based on the previous action is very important. This sequential behavior can be achieved in Unity and C# using coroutines and async functions. However, often, the question that comes up is which is better than the other? Let’s look at both these methods in a bit of detail.
Let’s have a quick look at what they are, and then we can move on to the main differences between them.
In Unity, coroutines are special methods that allow you to execute code over multiple frames without blocking the main thread. Coroutines are primarily used for tasks that take time, like waiting for an animation to finish, handling delays, or performing tasks incrementally. They are implemented using the IEnumerator
interface and are started using StartCoroutine
.
The code shown below gives a thorough use of how coroutines can be used:
using UnityEngine;public class CoroutineExample : MonoBehaviour{private void Start(){StartCoroutine(WaitAndPrint());}private IEnumerator WaitAndPrint(){Debug.Log("Before Wait");yield return new WaitForSeconds(2); // Wait for 2 secondsDebug.Log("After Wait");}}
Coroutines in Unity are lightweight and well-suited for frame-based tasks such as delays, animations, or incremental logic. They offer seamless integration with Unity APIs and low memory overhead. However, they lack flexibility for background processing, cannot directly return values, and have no built-in error handling or cancellation, making them less suitable for complex workflows or CPU-intensive operations.
Coroutines in Unity are best used for frame-based tasks that require sequential execution without blocking the main thread. They are ideal for implementing delays (WaitForSeconds
), animations, or gradual transitions like fading, scaling, or movement over time. Additionally, they work well for game mechanics such as cooldown timers, wave spawning, or scripted events. Coroutines are particularly effective when you need to break a larger task into smaller steps spread across multiple frames, ensuring smooth gameplay performance.
In Unity, async
refers to asynchronous programming using the async
and await
keywords in C#. This allows you to run long-running tasks, like downloading data from a server, loading assets, or performing computations, without blocking the main thread (which handles rendering and gameplay).
The code shown below gives an example of how async functions are used:
using System.Threading.Tasks;using UnityEngine;public class AsyncExample : MonoBehaviour{private async void Start(){Debug.Log("Before Task");await LoadAssetsAsync();Debug.Log("After Task");}private async Task LoadAssetsAsync(){// Simulate a delayawait Task.Delay(2000);Debug.Log("Assets Loaded");}}
Async functions in Unity offer a modern, readable way to handle asynchronous tasks, such as loading assets, making web requests, or performing file I/O, without blocking the main thread. They allow background processing, support return values via Task
, and simplify error handling with try-catch
. However, async functions come with limitations, such as restricted use of Unity APIs (which must run on the main thread), slightly higher memory overhead due to generated state machines, and potential complexity when managing cancellations or debugging. They are powerful for non-Unity tasks but must be used carefully in game development to avoid threading conflicts.
Async functions in Unity are best used for tasks that involve waiting for external operations without blocking the main thread, such as loading assets, making network requests, performing file I/O, or running heavy computations. They excel in scenarios where background processing is needed, like fetching data from APIs, downloading files, or handling database queries. Async functions are particularly useful when working with third-party libraries or APIs that support asynchronous programming, enabling smoother and more efficient workflows. However, they should be avoided for tasks that require direct Unity API calls, as these must always run on the main thread.
There are several differences in coroutines and async functions. Let us look at the following table, which displays some of them:
Coroutines | Async Functions |
Unity API feature | A C# feature |
A coroutine cannot return a value | An async function can return a value |
A coroutine stops if its object is destroyed | An async function does not stop if its object is destroyed |
Cannot use | Can use |
Does not have multithreading support | Has multithreading support |
Let us look at these points in a bit of detail:
Accessibility: A coroutine is a part of the MonoBehaviour
class, which is a part of the Unity API. This means that coroutines are only accessible to those classes that inherit from the MonoBehaviour
class, which effectively limits the type of classes that can use this tool. An async function, however, can be used in any class as it is a part of C#.
Returning a value: A coroutine returns an instance of IEnumerator
, which is used by Unity’s runtime to manage the coroutine. It cannot return any other value at any point. On the other hand, an async function has a Task<T>
type, which represents an operation that returns a variable of type T
upon completion. This value will be available once the task is completed and can be used with the await
keyword.
Lifetime management: A coroutine is tightly coupled to the MonoBehaviour
class that started it. If its MonoBehaviour
is destroyed or disabled, the coroutine will stop as well. Furthermore, re-enabling the object will not resume the coroutine either. However, an async function runs on a dedicated scheduler and requires manual lifetime management. It will not stop if the script instance is destroyed or disabled.
Error handling: Coroutines cannot use C#’s try
/catch
statements as yield
statements cannot be wrapped by a try
/catch
block. Async functions, on the other hand, can call await
commands from within try
/catch
blocks.
Multithreading support: Coroutines do not have multithreading support and run on the main thread. Async functions, by nature, run on multiple threads as they are asynchronous.
Let’s test our understanding with a short quiz.
What is true about coroutines in Unity?
Coroutines can run on multiple threads.
Coroutines can return values directly.
Coroutines are part of Unity’s MonoBehaviour class.
Coroutines can handle errors with try/catch blocks.
Conclusively, while both coroutines and async functions can implement the sequential execution of commands, they are generally used for different purposes. Coroutines execute a function over several frames, whereas async functions wait for I/O operations to complete. Both are very good techniques to learn and should be used according to their strengths.
Haven’t found what you were looking for? Contact Us
Free Resources