Scrapy and Selenium are two distinct frameworks commonly used for
Some of the advantages of using Scrapy are:
The disadvantages of using Scrapy are:
Doesn't support dynamic content reading by itself
Doesn't allow automation
Doesn't allow browser interactions
Has a steeper learning curve than other web scraping frameworks
Now, let's take a look at the pros of Selenium:
Allows automation of tasks
Allows browser interactions
Can handle dynamic web pages
Selenium has cross-browser and device support
Easier to learn
Here are the cons of Selenium:
Slow and resource-intensive
Doesn't scale for web scraping purposes
The table below compares Scrapy and Selenium on different performance rhetorics and features:
Comparison Rhetoric | Selenium | Scrapy |
Programming language | Python, Java, Javascript, C#, PHP, and Ruby | Python |
Asynchronous | No | Yes |
Processing speed | Slow | Fast |
Scalability | Low | High |
Data acquisition | Small to medium-scale | Small to large-scale |
Automation support | Yes | No |
Dynamic rendering | Yes, it renders Javascript and AJAX pages | None, requires additional libraries |
Browser interaction | Yes | No |
Browser support | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Opera, and HtmlUnit | No |
Scrapy and Selenium are two routinely compared libraries, despite one being a web scraping tool and the other being a tool for the automation of web-based testing. These libraries are helpful, and their applicability depends more on the project they are used for. Let's consider a few test cases:
If the project is to scrape dynamically rendered pages and the amount of data is minimal, then Selenium should be the go-to choice.
If the project requires scraping large amounts of data quickly, Scrapy should be the preferred choice.
If we want to scrape large amounts of data from a website with dynamically rendered pages or interact with the browser before scraping, we can use both Scrapy and Selenium together to improve our project's efficiency.
Scrapy vs Selenium
Scrapy is not asynchronous.
True
False
Free Resources