Macros vs. functions in Clojure

Key takeaways:

  • Clojure functions handle computations, while macros manipulate code.

  • Functions evaluate arguments first; macros work with unevaluated code.

  • Functions are straightforward; macros add custom syntax and code transformations.

  • Use functions for logic and calculations; use macros for creating new control structures or syntax.

Clojure, built on the Java virtual machine (JVM), is a functional programming language with dynamic typing that offers strong abstractions for writing clear and expressive code. Clojure toolkit consists of two important parts, Clojure and macros, each with a specific purpose in the language. We will explore the distinctions between Clojure functions and macros.

Functions in Clojure

In Clojure, functions are core features, meaning they can be assigned to variables, passed as arguments, and returned from other functions. They are defined using the defn special form, which stands for “define” function.

(defn add [a b]
  (+ a b))

In the example above, the add function takes parameters a and b and returns their sum using the + operator. Functions in Clojure are referentially transparent, meaning they promote the functional programming paradigm.

Macros in Clojure

Macros, on the other hand, are a more advanced feature in Clojure. They operate at the code transformation level, allowing developers to define new syntax or modify existing forms. Macros are created using the defmacro special form and receive unevaluated code as arguments. They produce code as their output, which is then evaluated by the Clojure compiler.

(defmacro unless
  "An implementation of unless control structure."
  [condition & body]
  `(if (not ~condition)
     (do ~@body)))

In the unless macro example above, it takes a condition and a body of code. It expands into an if statement checking the condition’s negation. The ~ symbol is used for splicing, allowing the code inside the body to be included in the expanded form.

Key differences

Here are a few key differences between functions and macros:

Evaluation time

One fundamental difference between macros and functions is the evaluation time. Functions evaluate their arguments before being called, whereas macros receive unevaluated code and decide how to evaluate it.

(defn example-fn [x]
  (println "Evaluating function")
  (* x x))
(defmacro example-macro [x]
  (println "Expanding macro")
  `(* ~x ~x))
(let [value 3]
  (println "Function result:" (example-fn value)) ; Prints "Evaluating function" and the result
  (println "Macro result:" (example-macro value))) ; Prints "Expanding macro" and the result

Code explanation

  • Line 1:

    • example-fn: A function that prints the “Evaluating function” and returns the square of x.

  • Line 5:

    • example-macro: A macro that prints “Expanding macro” during expansion and returns code to square x.

When you run the code:

  • The macro prints “Expanding macro” during its expansion, then evaluates to (* 3 3), which is 9.

  • The function prints “Evaluating function” when called, then returns 9.

Code expansion

Macros perform code expansion during compilation, modifying the code structure before execution. This enables developers to create domain-specific languages (DSLs) and custom control structures.

Execution model

Functions follow a traditional evaluation model, where arguments are evaluated before the function is called. Macros, on the other hand, have a more complex execution model. They receive unevaluated code and decide how and when to evaluate it. This flexibility allows macros to introduce new syntax and control flow constructs.

Summary: Functions vs. macros in Clojure

Aspect

Function

Macros

Purpose

Perform computations and logic.

Manipulate and transform code during compilation.

Definition

It is defined using defn.

It is defined using defmacro.

Argument Evaluation

Arguments are evaluated first before the function is executed.

Arguments are passed as unevaluated code and evaluated as needed/

Output

Returns computed values directly

Returns transformed code, which is then evaluated.

Use Case

Used for everyday tasks, calculations, and logic organization.

Used for creating new syntax, domain-specific languages (DSLs), or custom control flow.

Complexity

It is straightforward to use and understand.

It is advanced and requires an understanding of code evaluation and transformation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, functions and macros in Clojure serve distinct purposes in the language. Functions are the workhorses for everyday programming tasks, providing a clear and predictable evaluation model. With their ability to manipulate code at the compilation stage, Macros offer a more advanced and flexible toolset suitable for creating domain-specific languages and optimizing code generation.

When choosing between functions and macros, consider the nature of your problem. If you aim to express computations and organize logic, functions are likely the right choice. If, however, you need to create custom syntax or modify the structure of the code itself, macros provide the necessary power and expressiveness.

Frequently asked questions

Haven’t found what you were looking for? Contact Us

Is it better to use a macro or a function?

In most cases, it’s better to use a function due to simplicity, readability, and better error handling. Macros should be used only when you need code transformations or compile-time logic that functions can’t achieve.

When to use Clojure macros

Use Clojure macros when you need to manipulate code structure, introduce new language constructs, or perform operations at compile time that functions can’t handle, such as delaying execution or transforming syntax.

Can a macro execute faster than a function?

Yes, macros can sometimes execute faster because they run at compile time, reducing runtime overhead. However, this depends on the specific context, and the difference is usually minimal in practice.

What is the disadvantage of macros?

Macros can make code harder to read and debug, and they don’t work well with higher-order functions. They also increase complexity and may lead to unexpected behaviors if not used carefully.

Free Resources

Copyright ©2025 Educative, Inc. All rights reserved