Grok 3 vs GPT-4o

Key takeaways:

  • GPT-4o excels in real-time multimodal interactions which makes it ideal for conversational AI and multimedia tasks.

  • Grok 3 specializes in deep reasoning, math, and coding, leveraging reinforcement learning for problem-solving.

  • GPT-4o is faster and more cost-efficient, suitable for live interactions and translation.

  • Grok 3 supports up to 1 million tokens, excelling in long-context processing and detailed document analysis.

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, we see more specialized models and frameworks entering the space. Among them are Grok 3 and GPT-4o. Both are highly capable, but there are differences in their design, functionality, and the types of tasks they excel in. In this Answer, we will compare their capabilities, highlighting what sets them apart.

What is GPT-4o?

GPT-4o ("o" for Omni) is OpenAI's AI model, released in May 2024. It is a multimodal model, meaning it can process and generate text, audio, and images simultaneously. It is faster, more efficient, and more capable than previous versions like GPT-4 and GPT-3.5.

Interface using GPT-4o model
Interface using GPT-4o model

The free version of ChatGPT provides limited access to GPT-4o capabilities.

The following are key features of GPT-4o:

  1. Multimodal capabilities: It processes and generates text, speech, and images, enabling natural and dynamic interactions.

  2. Real-time responses: It can reply to audio inputs in just 320 milliseconds, making conversations feel more natural.

  3. Better language understanding: GPT-4o supports 50+ languages, using fewer tokens for some, making it more cost-efficient.

  4. Extended context memory: It handles up to 128,000 tokens, allowing for long-form content generation and deep analysis.

  5. Audio & vision processing: It recognizes speech, images, and videos, making it ideal for voice assistants, interactive storytelling, and visual analysis.

What is Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the latest iteration of xAI’s conversational AI, launched in February 2025. Built by Elon Musk’s xAI, it’s designed to accelerate human scientific discovery and provide helpful, truthful answers. Known for its "scary smart" capabilities, Grok 3 is not just a chatbot; it’s a reasoning powerhouse with features like Think mode, Brainstorm mode, and DeepSearch.

Interface using Grok 3 model
Interface using Grok 3 model

The following features set Grok 3:

  • Advanced reasoning: Grok 3 uses reinforcement learning to refine strategies, correct errors, and explore multiple solutions.

  • Test-time compute: It takes seconds to minutes for complex problem-solving, ensuring accuracy.

  • Mathematical & coding: It outperforms the latest GPT models on AIME 2024-25 (93.3%), GPQA (84.6%), and LiveCodeBench (79.4%).

  • Long-context processing: It supports up to 1 million tokens, making it ideal for handling extensive documents.

  • Multimodal capabilities – It focuses on text and image-based reasoning.

Now that we've understood these models and their capabilities, let's compare them.

GPT-4o vs. Grok 3

Key differences

GPT-4o

Grok 3

Model Type

Multi-modal AI model

AI model with advanced reasoning

Input modalities

Text, audio, image, video

Text, image

Processing speed

Responds to audio inputs as fast as 232-320ms (similar to human response time)

Takes seconds to minutes for deep thinking

Mathematical abilities

Proficient but not the highest-ranked

Leading in AIME 2025 & coding tasks

Long context handling

128k tokens

1 million tokens

Deployment

Available in ChatGPT & API

Rolling out on 𝕏 Premium & Grok.com

Common use case

Real-time conversations

Deep reasoning, advanced computation

GPT-4o vs. Grok 3: Pretraining and benchmark comparison

Grok 3 is optimized for instant, high-quality responses, excelling in non-reasoning tasks like graduate-level science (GPQA), general knowledge (MMLU-Pro), and math competition problems (AIME). It also outperforms in multimodal understanding, including image (MMMU) and video (EgoSchema) tasks. GPT-4o, on the other hand, is designed for a balanced approach, including reasoning-based tasks, but underperforms in some academic benchmarks compared to Grok 3.

Benchmark

Grok 3(beta)

GPT-4o

AIME’24

52.2%

9.3%

GPQA

75.4%

53.6%

LCB

57.0%

32.3%

MMLU-Pro

79.9%

72.6%

LOFT

83.3%

78.0%

SimpleQA

43.6%

38.2%

MMMU

73.2%

69.1%

EgoSchema

74.5%

72.2%

If you’re interested in creating a chatbot, check out our course: Guide to Building Python and LLM-Based Multimodal Chatbots.

Conclusion

Grok 3 and GPT-4o are both remarkable AIs, but they cater to different strengths. GPT-4o is ideal for real-time, multimodal applications, making it a great choice for live conversations and multimedia processing. On the other hand, Grok 3 is optimized for deep reasoning, excelling in complex problem-solving and long-context document analysis.

Frequently asked questions

Haven’t found what you were looking for? Contact Us


Does Grok use GPT?

No, Grok is developed by xAI and does not use OpenAI’s GPT models.


How much better is GPT-4 than GPT-3?

GPT-4 is significantly better—about 40% more accurate on reasoning tasks, with a larger context window (128,000 vs. 4,096 tokens) and improved language fluency.


How advanced is Grok AI?

Grok 3 is highly advanced, excelling in deep reasoning, mathematics, and coding, with reinforcement learning for problem-solving.


Is Grok 3 the best AI?

It is among the top AI models, particularly for reasoning and complex computations, but the best model depends on the use case.


What are the main differences between Grok 3, GPT-o1, and GPT-o1 Pro?

  • Grok 3: Strong in reasoning (e.g., Think mode), real-time data via DeepSearch, 1M-token context, built on xAI’s Colossus supercluster.
  • GPT-o1: Focuses on advanced reasoning, excels in general problem-solving, lacks real-time data, smaller context window (~128K tokens).
  • GPT-o1 Pro: Prioritizes speed, accuracy, and enterprise features like API access, but focuses less on real-time data.

Which AI model is better for coding?

The best AI model for coding depends on factors like accuracy, language support, and real-time assistance. Models trained specifically for programming, such as those optimized for code generation, debugging, and explanation, generally perform better. Features like autocomplete, contextual understanding, and multi-language support make an AI model more suitable for coding. The choice also depends on whether the AI is used for general-purpose programming, competitive coding, or enterprise-level software development.


Free Resources

Copyright ©2025 Educative, Inc. All rights reserved