Flutter vs. React Native

Key takeaways:

  • Flutter uses Dart with a widget-based framework, compiling directly to ARM or x86 native code for high performance. React Native relies on JavaScript and React, translating code via a JavaScript bridge for runtime execution.

  • Flutter uses a custom rendering engine for pixel-perfect and consistent UIs across platforms, while React Native utilizes native components for platform-specific appearances, often requiring platform-specific code for precise UI control.

  • Flutter avoids a JavaScript bridge, enabling faster startup times and smoother animations. React Native introduces performance overhead from runtime translation but remains adequate for less resource-intensive applications.

  • Flutter supports Android, iOS, web, desktop, and embedded systems with comprehensive multi-platform tools. React Native primarily targets Android and iOS, with experimental web support and limited non-mobile platform capabilities.

Flutter and React Native are two of the most prominent cross-platform frameworks for mobile app development, both enabling the creation of apps for iOS and Android from a single codebase. Each offers unique tools, features, and capabilities, which can make selecting the right one for your project challenging. In this guide, we’ll explore the key differences between them, helping you make a more informed decision based on your needs.


Key differences between flutter and React Native

Let's have a look at the differences:

1. Development approach

Flutter

  • Created by Google, Flutter uses the Dart programming language. Its development approach centers around a widget-based architecture. Flutter provides a rich set of pre-designed widgets that developers can use to create complex and aesthetically pleasing user interfaces easily.

  • Hot-reload in Flutter allows developers to instantly see the effects of code changes, making the development process faster and more iterative.

React Native

  • Backed by Meta (Facebook), React Native leverages JavaScript along with React (a popular web development framework). This allows web developers to reuse their existing skills in React to build mobile apps.

  • React Native also supports component reusability, allowing developers to write once and use components across both mobile platforms.

2. Performance and speed

Flutter

  • Native compilation of Flutter apps makes them highly performant. Since Dart code is compiled directly into ARM or x86 native code, Flutter provides fast app startup times and smooth animations.

  • The absence of a bridge between Dart and the native environment enhances performance, as the framework communicates directly with platform APIs.

React Native

  • React Native introduces some performance overhead due to the JavaScript bridge, which translates the JavaScript code into native elements at runtime. This can cause slower performance, particularly with more complex animations or computationally intensive tasks.

  • However, React Native apps can still deliver adequate performance for most use cases, especially for simpler applications.

3. User Interface (UI) and design

Flutter

  • Flutter’s widget-based architecture allows developers to create highly customizable UIs with rich animations and consistent performance across platforms. The UI in Flutter looks and behaves the same regardless of the platform, due to its reliance on a custom rendering engine.

  • This consistency ensures that the app design is platform-agnostic, giving developers complete control over the appearance of the app.

React Native

  • React Native uses native components like buttons, sliders, and navigation elements that adhere to each platform’s design guidelines. This enables React Native apps to look and feel more "native" to the platform they are running on, such as iOS or Android.

  • Developers may need to write platform-specific code to customize the look and feel of their app on each platform, leading to a more fragmented design experience.

4. Community and ecosystem

Flutter

Flutter’s community is growing at a fast pace, backed by Google’s active development and support. It has an ever-expanding repository of packages and plugins available through Pub, Flutter's package manager. The extensive documentation and a wealth of tutorials make it easy to get started with the framework.

React Native

With a longer history and a massive user base, React Native benefits from a mature ecosystem and a vast collection of libraries and third-party integrations available through npm (Node Package Manager). Its active community provides regular updates, resources, and community-driven contributions like plugins and solutions for common development issues.

5. Popularity and industry adoption

Flutter

Flutter has seen rising adoption among both startups and enterprises. Companies like Google Ads, Etsy, and Alibaba use Flutter to build highly responsive and visually appealing mobile apps. Its popularity is increasing as developers recognize its strengths in performance and UI design.

React Native

React Native remains the most widely used cross-platform mobile framework. It powers some of the world’s most popular apps, including Facebook, Instagram, Airbnb, and Walmart. Its extensive adoption in the tech industry ensures strong support and continued innovation.

6. Platform support

Flutter

Flutter offers support for multiple platforms beyond just Android and iOS, including web, desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), and embedded systems. This makes it a versatile solution for apps that need to reach a wider audience across various devices.

React Native

React Native primarily targets Android and iOS but also offers experimental support for web and other platforms. However, its web support is not as fully developed as Flutter's, making it a less ideal choice for projects that require broad platform compatibility.


Advantages and disadvantages

Let's have a look at the advantages and disadvantages:

Framework

Advantages

Disadvantages

Flutter

  • Excellent performance with native compilation

  • Highly customizable and beautiful UIs

  • Hot-reload for fast development

  • Support for web, desktop, and embedded systems

  • Steeper learning curve due to Dart

  • Larger app size

  • Fewer third-party libraries compared to React Native

React Native

  • Easier to learn with JavaScript/React

  • Larger ecosystem and community support

  • Mature with more industry adoption

  • Native look and feel across platforms

  • Performance overhead due to the JavaScript bridge

  • Platform-specific code for UI consistency

  • Limited support for non-mobile platforms


Conclusion

Choosing between Flutter and React Native depends largely on your project requirements, developer expertise, and the platforms you intend to target.

  • Flutter is ideal for projects that prioritize high performance, a beautiful and consistent UI across platforms, and broader platform support.

  • React Native is well-suited for projects where you want a native look and feel, leverage existing JavaScript/React expertise, and take advantage of its mature ecosystem.

In essence, both frameworks are excellent for cross-platform development, but Flutter offers more flexibility for performance-intensive and visually rich apps, while React Native shines in projects that prioritize leveraging existing web development skills and a robust community.

Here is a quick summary:

Summary of comparisons

Features

Flutter

React Native

Developer

Google

Facebook

Language

Dart

JavaScript

Performance

Performs well, executes code quickly

Performance overhead


Pre-designed customizable widgets

Yes

No

Development support

Extensive documentation

Knowledge sharing through forums

Popularity

Gaining popularity, used by startups and big enterprises

Widely adopted across industries

Platforms supported

Android, iOS, web, desktop, embedded systems

Mainly Android and iOS, experimental web support

Notable apps

Google Ads, Etsy, Google Pay

Facebook, Instagram, Airbnb

Frequently asked questions

Haven’t found what you were looking for? Contact Us


Should I learn Flutter or React Native in 2024?

Whether you should learn Flutter or React Native in 2024 depends on your goals, experience, and project needs. Here are some key factors to consider:

  • Existing Knowledge: If you already have experience with JavaScript and React, learning React Native might be easier for you since it leverages the same technologies. This could lead to a faster learning curve and quicker app development.

  • Performance Needs: If you’re focused on building apps with high performance, smooth animations, and visually rich UIs, Flutter might be a better choice due to its native compilation and custom rendering engine.

  • Cross-Platform Reach: Flutter provides broader platform support beyond mobile (iOS and Android), including web, desktop, and embedded systems, making it more versatile if you need to target multiple platforms.

  • Community and Ecosystem: React Native benefits from a larger, more mature ecosystem with extensive third-party libraries and community support, which can be helpful for troubleshooting and finding resources.

  • Industry Adoption: Both frameworks are widely adopted, with React Native having a longer history and more industry usage, while Flutter is rapidly gaining popularity, especially in visually demanding apps.

In summary, if you’re looking for broader platform support and high-performance apps, Flutter is a great option. If you want a more mature ecosystem and already know JavaScript, React Native might be a better fit. Both are valuable to learn in 2024, so choose based on your project needs and prior knowledge.


Is Flutter facing its end?

No, Flutter is not facing its end. It continues to grow with active support from Google, expanding platform reach (iOS, Android, web, desktop, and embedded systems), and rising popularity among companies like Google Ads and Alibaba. With a growing community and ecosystem, Flutter remains a strong and relevant tool for cross-platform development in 2024.


Free Resources

Copyright ©2025 Educative, Inc. All rights reserved